Ancestry Family Tree Genealogy
You are currently anonymous Log In
 

Margaret Bliss

Female 1649 - 1745  (95 years)


Personal Information    |    Notes    |    Sources    |    All    |    PDF

  • Name Margaret Bliss  [1
    Born 10 Nov 1649  Springfield, MA Find all individuals with events at this location  [2
    Gender Female 
    _UID 4F3E0A3579E145038FB9E4AAD76CF244BDEC 
    Died 3 Apr 1745  Colchester, Connecticut Find all individuals with events at this location 
    Person ID I942  Bradley - Post
    Last Modified 30 Jul 2013 

    Father Thomas Bliss,   b. Abt 1580, Okehampton, Belston, Devon, England Find all individuals with events at this location,   d. 1650, Hartford, Hartford County, Connecticut Find all individuals with events at this location  (Age ~ 70 years) 
    Mother Margaret Hulins,   b. Abt 1595, Rodborough, Gloucestershire, England Find all individuals with events at this location,   d. 28 Aug 1684, Springfield, MA Find all individuals with events at this location  (Age ~ 89 years) 
    Married Abt 1612  England Find all individuals with events at this location 
    Family ID F52  Group Sheet  |  Family Chart

    Family Nathaniel Foote,   b. 16 Jan 1646, Wethersfield, Hartford, CT Find all individuals with events at this location,   d. 12 Jan 1702, Wethersfield, Hartford, CT Find all individuals with events at this location  (Age 55 years) 
    Married 2 May 1672  Springfield, MA Find all individuals with events at this location  [1, 2
    Children 
     1. Nathaniel Foote,   b. 9 Sep 1682, Colchester, Connecticut Find all individuals with events at this location,   d. 20 Aug 1774, Colchester, Connecticut Find all individuals with events at this location  (Age 91 years)
     2. Ephraim Foote,   b. 13 Feb 1684, Colchester, Connecticut Find all individuals with events at this location,   d. 10 Jun 1765, Colchester, Connecticut Find all individuals with events at this location  (Age 81 years)
    Last Modified 15 Jan 2018 
    Family ID F353  Group Sheet  |  Family Chart

  • Notes 
    • In comparison with other research, Margaret may be Thomas' granddaughter rather than daughter (ergo, a missing generation between them).

  • Sources 
    1. [S22] Notes.

    2. [S1] Register of Pedigrees, , p. 210.